Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 5:48:01 GMT -4
The one but there are a lot of training guides online they say it only takes weeks to train for it. Me ... dbd..jpg The philosophy of doing a lot what we dont yet do well is ruining content marketing and the knees joints and backs of wannabe marathoners. If you doubt that please explain why of whats published online barely rises to the level of crap. Anyone who disagrees with that statement is either a fooling themselves or b never had to conduct a content audit. Even for big brands producing quality content with frequency is seemingly nearimpossible task.
Therefore when someone says create more content I hear brands will continue Greece Mobile Number List to waste resources that would be better spent elsewhere for now. Worse still it means theyll see the failure as not one of execution but born of content marketing itself. cffae..jpg Rayson is a solid content marketer working for a brand with a strong product. I admire them both. And while I dont mean to attack him I would like to tackle the logic of the post which Ill excerpt below. Eds. note The primary reason I chose to tackle this topic is because content frequency and content length remain two of the biggest albatrosses impacting our industry.
Despite this fact many fail to see how related they are. That is many brands are failing fast by chasing the longform posts and frequent posting unicorn. Also Im very clear in understanding that Rayson is not advocating for quantity at the expense of quality. My contention is simply that quantity is typically the wrong goal at least for the vast majority of brands. Youre a brand who publishes content not a brand publisher The Washington Post now publishes around posts a day. That is an incredible amount of content. was surely that is too much the quality will suffer why produce so much content The answer seems to be that.
Therefore when someone says create more content I hear brands will continue Greece Mobile Number List to waste resources that would be better spent elsewhere for now. Worse still it means theyll see the failure as not one of execution but born of content marketing itself. cffae..jpg Rayson is a solid content marketer working for a brand with a strong product. I admire them both. And while I dont mean to attack him I would like to tackle the logic of the post which Ill excerpt below. Eds. note The primary reason I chose to tackle this topic is because content frequency and content length remain two of the biggest albatrosses impacting our industry.
Despite this fact many fail to see how related they are. That is many brands are failing fast by chasing the longform posts and frequent posting unicorn. Also Im very clear in understanding that Rayson is not advocating for quantity at the expense of quality. My contention is simply that quantity is typically the wrong goal at least for the vast majority of brands. Youre a brand who publishes content not a brand publisher The Washington Post now publishes around posts a day. That is an incredible amount of content. was surely that is too much the quality will suffer why produce so much content The answer seems to be that.